UX Design // Task 1

05.04.2023 - 13.04.2023 // Week 01 - Week 02
Yong Li Qing Vernice / 0352288
Bachelor of Design (Hons) in Creative Media
UX Design
Task 1 // Case study: Scenario


LECTURE

Week 1
Briefing of the Module

Week 2
Introduction to UX Design: Bad vs Good UX Design


Lecture's Notes_Week 2: PPT Slides
Characteristics of a good UX according to Google



INSTRUCTION



Task 1 - Bad vs Good UX Design (Case Study: Scenario)
Fig 1.1_PPT Slide: Bad vs Good UX Design
Fig 1.2_PPT Slide: Instruction for Task 1
  1. Objective: To identify and analyze good and bad UX design in different scenarios and present your findings in a Google Slides presentation. 

  2. Choose a Case Study: Select a case study where UX design played a critical role in the success or failure of the product/service. Examples could include websites, apps, or physical products. 

  3. Research and Analyze: Research the case study and identify the characteristics of good and bad UX design in the scenario. Consider aspects such as usability, accessibility, visual design, information architecture, and user feedback. Collect screenshots or images to illustrate your points.

  4. Create a Google Slides Presentation: Create a Google Slides presentation with a minimum of 6 slides to present your findings.

The presentation should include:
  • Title Slide: Include a title slide that introduces the case study and your analysis.

  • Case Study: Provide an overview of the case study and the UX design aspects that were successful or unsuccessful.

  • Characteristics of Good UX Design: List and explain the key characteristics of good UX design that were present in the case study.

  • Characteristics of Bad UX Design: List and explain the key characteristics of bad UX design that were present in the case study.

  • Conclusion: Summarize your findings and offer recommendations for how the UX design could have been improved in the scenario.

  • Presentation: Each student will present their Google Slides presentation to the class for marks. The presentation should be clear, concise, and engaging, with a focus on communicating the key takeaways from the case study and the analysis of good and bad UX design.

  • Assessment: The assessment of each student's presentation will be based on the clarity and effectiveness of the communication, the depth and quality of the analysis, and the adherence to the presentation guidelines.
Fig 1.3_PPT Slide: Scenario 1: Self-Service Locker Task Requirements

Progression

Group Members _
Scenario 1:  Self-Service Locker

1. Takuto Hozumi
2. Cheryl Voo Yie Qi
3. Yong Li Qing Vernice
4. Safanah Aulia Asep

Fig 2.1 _ Taylor's iLocker at Level 1
Fig 2.2 _ Taylor's iLocker 
Fig 2.3 _ Group Observation
Group 1: Locker _ Presentation Slides 

FEEDBACK



REFLECTION


FURTHER READING


Comments